• Yes. As we said before, one can use the same style of thinking that frequently results in a slippery slope mistake to construct a logical argument. Consider this instance.
• It seems sensible to assert that lowering admission standards will increase enrollment at a school since more students are now eligible to enroll. 
• The probability that the original occurrence will result in the desired outcome distinguishes a false slippery slope argument from one that is not. Due to the fact that this isn't an exact science, an argument may vacillate between being erroneous and logical.
• It is best to distinguish between truth and conjecture and look up any pertinent statistics connected to a claim if you want to avoid making slippery slope arguments as a writer or astute reader. 
• Find out if there is proof for the alleged connection between two or more events, and if feasible, look for any documentation that the argument truly occurred. But bear in mind that, even if there's a chance it may, just because something happened in the past doesn't mean that it will happen the same way again.
• It's crucial to thoroughly go through your writing before transmitting, posting, or submitting it. 
• You could unknowingly use a slippery slope argument or merely overstate the strength of a weak connection between two occurrences. It's a good idea to check your grammar and spelling while you're at it. Pay particular attention to details like your word choice and areas where you may organize and streamline your work as you read through a rough copy.

‍